»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
A Serious Test For ‘Boys, Have At It’?
Jul 19th, 2010 by Journo

Click Here To Find Cool Nascar Items!

“Boys, have at it” may have finally reached its limit.

In the final lap of the Nationwide race at Gateway this weekend, familiar foes Brad Keselowski and Carl Edwards went at it…again. Each driver took a shot at the other, beginning with Keselowski into Edwards, and ending with Edwards into Keselowski (and Keselowski into the wall and Shelby Howard into him). The controversial end to the race is just the latest in a series of incidents since NASCAR loosened its grip on driver confrontations.

Overall, I think we can all agree the policy shift has been successful. Drivers are now settling their disputes between each other, and NASCAR is not affecting points or relationships. Like all good things though, there comes a time when too much of a good thing becomes a bad thing – we may have seen that Saturday night.

Perhaps the goal of these two is to see which can kill the other first – I don’t know. That said, I can’t necessarily blame either for their individual actions. Brad was utilizing the bump and run (it didn’t work), and Carl wasn’t happy about it (given their relationship that’s no surprise). What transpired just short of the start/finish line though should be yet another warning for all those considering ending a fellow competitors day on track.

Did you see how hard Shelby Howard hit Keselowski? The front stretch at such a small track is dangerous with the checkered flag in the air. Again, I don’t necessarily blame Carl for doing what he did, but I think we’re nearing the point when NASCAR needs to draw a line in the sand, and say “this is not acceptable.”

The problem with NASCAR issuing damaging penalties though is that it could have a chilling effect on the policy. If drivers see that there are limits, they might be more apt to keep their mouths shut and their frustration private – something NASCAR desperately wants to avoid.

NASCAR has to walk a very fine line with this (especially under the circumstances). Too much of a penalty they risk alienating a positive policy change. Not enough, they enhance the environment for something more serious to occur.

So far we’ve just seen probation given to those who have actively engaged in on-track retaliation this season. Could that change on Tuesday (NASCAR’s usual penalty announcement day)? I honestly don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised either way.

What do you think? Was the payback justified? Should Carl be penalized? What’s the limit for ‘boys, have at it’? Talk amongst yourselves.

TheNASCARInsiders.com

Follow the Insiders on Twitter or be a fan on Facebook!

Self-Policing…I Guess We See How That Worked
Mar 8th, 2010 by Journo

Click Here To Find Cool Nascar Items!

NASCAR policies often ebb and flow in their enforcement. In the past we’ve seen a sanctioning body that really likes to loosen things up when people start complaining; but when that inevitable watershed event occurs enforcement gets ramped up again.

In true NASCAR form, this season brought us one of those promises of lighter enforcement. They wanted to foster an atmosphere of self-policing (within moderation of course). In response to that just more than a month ago Robin Pemberton looked at the gathered media and said, “Boys, have at it.”

Well Sunday in Atlanta, NASCAR got their wish; the boys had at it. After getting wrecked early in the race, Carl Edwards returned to the track 153 laps down and quite clearly took out the guy who helped him into the wall earlier.

That guy, Brad Keselowski, has made a name for himself in his very short career of getting involved in incidents like this one. Remember the Brad K. v. Denny Hamlin feud just a few months ago? Right or wrong, being aggressive and unapologetic about it is his style.

So with that, it was only a matter of time before an incident like this one occurred and it came as no surprise (to me at least) that Brad K. was involved.

I applauded NASCAR’s move before the season began and I still believe it was a good call. I think this incident though should be a wake up call to everyone in the garage. There’s self-policing and then there’s self-policing. Everyone needs to agree this sort of thing can’t be tolerated. Obviously Carl didn’t mean for Keselowski to get airborne, or expect that happen, but the possibility always exists at 200 mph.

That said though, I have a hard time justifying a suspension, and I’d be surprised if NASCAR issued one (famous last words). Even more, of all people to be calling for someone to get suspended for aggressive driving, it’s almost laughable that person is Brad Keselowski. By all means he deserves to be angry for what resulted from the payback; he could have been seriously injured (thankfully he wasn’t). But if ever there was a situation where that old idiom ‘the pot calling the kettle black’ applies, this is it.

No question, it’s unfortunate this happened. Frankly drivers should know better than to do things like this. While I can’t say what the proper punishment should be here, Robin Pemberton has said NASCAR will evaluate the incident further. If there are additional penalties, we’ll likely hear about them by Tuesday.

So what do you think? Was the retaliation justified? What, if any, should the punishment be for retaliating on track?

Keselowski Continues To Make Enemies
Nov 16th, 2009 by T.C.

Click Here To Find Cool Nascar Items!

Following another run-in with Brad Keselowski during Saturday’s Nationwide Series race at Phoenix, Dave Burns of ESPN asked Denny Hamlin if NASCAR needed to get involved.  Hamlin responded: “No, no, I’ll take care of him.  It’s no biggy.  I got him.”

Anybody else looking forward to this situation heading to Homestead?

In his ascension to the Cup Series this year, Keselowski has often used his bumper and some aggressive driving to get the job done.  And it seems as though he’s done it more often lately.  He has been called out by a few drivers including Hamlin and the brothers Busch.  But strong words and threats from competitors haven’t slowed him down.  Maybe a little retaliation will.

Hamlin and Keselowski have had on track incidents before, but fuel was added to the fire on Saturday.  Following a restart, Hamlin’s Toyota got into Keselowski’s Chevy into turn one, sending the #88 car up the track.  On the same lap, Keselowski attempted payback into turn three, but missed.  Then in the center of three and four, Brad K. caught Hamlin and laid the bumper to him, sending Hamlin’s GameStop Camry around in front of the field.

After the warning from Hamlin during a post race interview, and the comments from other drivers, Keselowski was called into a meeting this morning with Cup Series directory John Darby and NASCAR’s CEO, Brian France.  Keselowski told reporters the meeting “went real well.” 

I certainly can’t fault Brad for being aggressive, as he is out there to win.  And a little bumping and banging, along with some flared tempers always makes for some good racing action.  But Keselowski needs to be a little more careful about who he roughs up.  If he continues to cause problems with some of the sport’s top drivers, they can make life very difficult for him.  He will be entering his first full season of Cup competition in 2010, and in order to be successful, he’s going to need at least a few friends.  A driver that doesn’t respect him won’t give him room on the race track and they won’t help him out when he needs it.

Hopefully though, he is able to find a balance between being aggressive and also respectful.  Mending a few fences along the way probably wouldn’t hurt either.

But no matter what happens, it sounds like things could get interesting this weekend at Homestead.

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa
<